By now you probably know about the car modification-ban restrictions in the state of California.
The restrictions were implemented after a car dealer in Los Angeles was found guilty of selling cars to people with broken-down cars.
A judge ruled that the dealer, J.D. Power, violated state law by failing to properly register the vehicles it sold.
The dealer was ordered to pay a fine of $15,000, and to register the cars with the California Department of Motor Vehicles.
It was the second time in as many months that J. D. Power has been ordered to comply with the state’s new vehicle-modification ban.
The ban has been a thorn in the side of manufacturers and automakers for years.
A California Supreme Court ruling last month said the state could not use the ban to impose new limits on vehicle modifications.
The court also ruled that California had no authority to make the change and that it had no “immunity” from the federal government to do so.
The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled against the federal ban, saying the ban is “unconstitutional and cannot be upheld.”
And this week the California Supreme Board of Appeals agreed with the U. S. Supreme court and said it would not take up the case, saying that the ban would violate California’s constitutional guarantee of free speech.
Now, the state has passed a law banning the sale of “personal vehicles” to people who have been convicted of a felony, a felony in California.
A new bill that has been introduced in the legislature would allow the sale and use of cars with an automatic transmission, a high-revving engine or a turbocharged engine.
This would apply to cars with a V8 or V10 engine, and not cars with automatic transmissions.
But even with the new law, the ban has already drawn criticism from manufacturers, and even some of the state lawmakers who have signed the bill.
“I think the Legislature has gone way too far, and I think it’s an absolute overreach,” said Assemblyman Mark Leno (D-San Francisco).
The bill passed the Assembly on Thursday, and Leno has been lobbying to have it signed into law.
But some Democrats and civil rights groups have said it could have more impact if it were written specifically for the car industry.
“It’s a great idea, but if you look at the bill, it’s geared toward the car business, and it’s not geared toward people who might have to go through the hardship of having to go to court,” said state Sen. Tom Ammiano (D, Costa Mesa).
But Leno is concerned about the new bill.
“I’m worried that we’ve put in place an environment where if you’re convicted of the crime for which you’re facing a sentence, you’re basically locked up,” he said.
“That’s not what California is about.”
The California Automobile Dealers Association has said it will continue to fight for the new legislation, even though some industry groups have expressed concerns about it.
The association’s president, Chris Hensley, said that the new ban could be a threat to California’s automotive industry.
The ban also came after a federal appeals court ruled against California’s ban on “recreational vehicles” last year.
The ruling said that California could not make the ban because it violated the Commerce Clause of the U,S.
In January, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that a law restricting sales of cars and trucks with automatic transmission was unconstitutional.